Relationship between fork length (FL) at capture and (A) otolith size

Download scientific diagram | Relationship between fork length (FL) at capture and (A) otolith size (OS) measured across transverse sections and (B) scale size (SS) measured from the focus to the anterior edge. Regression lines depict linear (dashed lines) and logarithmic fits (solid lines). For A, linear: OS = 1.89 + 0.09 · FL, r 2 = 0.94; log: OS = 3.29 · log e FL – 6.32, r 2 = 0.95. For B, linear: SS = –0.12 + 0.07 · FL, r 2 = 0.88; log: SS = 2.38 · log e FL – 6.07, r 2 = 0.89.  from publication: Longitudinal Length Back-Calculations from Otoliths and Scales Differ Systematically in Haddock | Parallel macrostructure analysis of otoliths versus scales was conducted on Georges Bank Haddock Melanogrammus aeglefinus sampled in spring 2011 to test whether annuli widths of both structures yield comparable estimates of back-calculated length at age. While generally | Otolith, Otolithic Membrane and Fish | ResearchGate, the professional network for scientists.

Fisheries Oceanography, Aquaculture Journal

Hoplostethus atlanticus. Details of otolith samples ex- amined

Decoupling of otolith and somatic growth during anadromous

Relationship between fork length (FL) at capture and (A) otolith size

Frontiers Bomb Radiocarbon, Otolith Daily Increments and Length

CSIRO PUBLISHING Marine and Freshwater Research

Queen triggerfish Balistes vetula: Validation of otolith-based age

Relationship between fork length (FL) at capture and (A) otolith

Sexual maturity in western Atlantic bluefin tuna

Age and Growth of Southern Bluefin Tuna, Thunnus maccoyii, Based

Full article: The enigmatic occurrence, size distribution, and

Relationship between fork length (FL) at capture and (A) otolith

13 60 mm hi-res stock photography and images - Page 4 - Alamy

7th International Science Symposium & Flats Expo by Bonefish

Indian River Lagoon Species Inventory Taxon Profile