PDF) A randomized clinical trial to compare the effectiveness of canine lacebacks with reference to canine tip

Description

PDF | To assess the effectiveness of canine lacebacks on the proclination of the upper incisors with reference to pre-treatment canine tip. Randomized | Find, read and cite all the research you need on ResearchGate

Comparative evaluation of the efficiency of canine retraction using modified Marcotte and T-loop retraction springs - A split-mouth, randomized clinical trial. - Abstract - Europe PMC

Figure 4 from Individual canine retraction: RCT comparing Mulligan bypasses arch and Active laceback ligatures

PDF] A Comparison of Effect of Regular Laceback Technique and Its Modification on Anchorage Loss

Comparative evaluation of the efficiency of canine retraction using modified Marcotte and T-loop retraction springs - A split-mouth, randomized clinical trial. - Abstract - Europe PMC

PDF] A Comparison of Effect of Regular Laceback Technique and Its Modification on Anchorage Loss

Orthodonticanchorage Asystematicreview, PDF, Systematic Review

PDF) Individual canine retraction: RCT comparing Mulligan bypasses arch and Active laceback ligatures

Orthodonticanchorage Asystematicreview, PDF, Systematic Review

International Journal of Orthodontics - Fall 2016 by Legwork - Issuu

PDF) The effectiveness of laceback ligatures: A randomized controlled clinical trial

Anchorage condition during canine retraction using transpalatal arch with continuous and segmented arch mechanics

Profile of a randomized clinical trial to evaluate the effect of canine

Figure 1 from Individual canine retraction: RCT comparing Mulligan bypasses arch and Active laceback ligatures

$ 25.99USD
Score 4.8(351)
In stock
Continue to book