Dual ProGlide versus ProGlide and FemoSeal for vascular access

Description

This study compared outcomes of 874 patients who received either two ProGlide devices or one ProGlide plus one FemoSeal for vascular closure after transfemoral TAVI, finding reduced complications with the combination approach.

Terumo Femoseal

Extravascular Closure Devices: Are They Advantageous? - Cardiac Interventions Today

One-year outcomes with two suture-mediated closure devices to achieve access-site haemostasis following transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation

Large-Bore Access Site Management - Cardiac Interventions Today

An upfront combined strategy for endovascular haemostasis in transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation

Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Trials on the Safety of Vascular Closure Devices for Femoral Arterial Puncture Site Haemostasis

Propensity-matched comparison of vascular closure devices after transcatheter aortic valve replacement using MANTA versus ProGlide

The adjunctive use of Angio-Seal in femoral vascular closure following percutaneous transcatheter aortic valve replacement

Dual Suture Versus Suture and Plug Closure Devices for Large Bore Access Haemostasis During Percutaneous Access Endovascular Aneurysm Repair

Stephan Heo, MD (@StephanHeo) / X

Stephan Heo, MD (@StephanHeo) / X

$ 15.50USD
Score 4.7(657)
In stock
Continue to book